<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VoIP: Still Unsecure?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aboutvoip.org/voip-still-unsecure.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aboutvoip.org/voip-still-unsecure.php</link>
	<description>Voice over IP news. All about VoIP.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:56:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Highway Five</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutvoip.org/voip-still-unsecure.php/comment-page-1#comment-17035</link>
		<dc:creator>Highway Five</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutvoip.org/voip-still-unsecure.php#comment-17035</guid>
		<description>Thatâ€™s a nice article. I found you via the placing you received in the The VoIP-News Top 25 VoIP Blogs of 2007. I am fairly new to VOIP but personally I have always found Interoute a joy to work with. They currently supply our secure business voip network.


&lt;a&gt; secure business voip&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thatâ€™s a nice article. I found you via the placing you received in the The VoIP-News Top 25 VoIP Blogs of 2007. I am fairly new to VOIP but personally I have always found Interoute a joy to work with. They currently supply our secure business voip network.</p>
<p><a> secure business voip</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are we letting our guard down when it comes to VoIP security? &#124; VoIP Survivor</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutvoip.org/voip-still-unsecure.php/comment-page-1#comment-17030</link>
		<dc:creator>Are we letting our guard down when it comes to VoIP security? &#124; VoIP Survivor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 09:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutvoip.org/voip-still-unsecure.php#comment-17030</guid>
		<description>[...] The IP based services, be they voice communications such as VoIP or other messaging services envisioned, must provide the end-customers and carriers with a security level at least comparable to that of the present generation of services. The new generation of voice services over IP must guarantee that the voice &#8220;channel&#8221; is secure against unlawful interception and wiretapping, and that the signaling and session set-up (with the SIP protocol) is secured against monitoring and manipulation by 3rd parties. This is not the case today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The IP based services, be they voice communications such as VoIP or other messaging services envisioned, must provide the end-customers and carriers with a security level at least comparable to that of the present generation of services. The new generation of voice services over IP must guarantee that the voice &#8220;channel&#8221; is secure against unlawful interception and wiretapping, and that the signaling and session set-up (with the SIP protocol) is secured against monitoring and manipulation by 3rd parties. This is not the case today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
